Discrepancy in food labels for calories

Old 04-29-2010, 10:47 AM
FitDay Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4
Exclamation Discrepancy in food labels for calories

I was wondering how Fitday figures out the calories on certain foods. For instance one large baked egg on fitday is worth 125 calories, yet on the box it says 70 calories. Thats a 55 calorie difference and definitely enough to take notice if you are counting calories. I looked around and found out that the FDA only legally allows a 20% difference on the calorie value of food from what's on the label. So who is wrong here? Granted 1 large egg is a subjective term but even the medium was way over too. Also 1 cup of raw pineapple here is 74 calories. But I've seen estimates as low as 50 calories. So I guess the question is, how do I know this information is accurate?
The__Dude is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 11:45 AM
FitDay Premium Member
RunbikeSki's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,042

Hey Dude,
FitDay uses an "average value" for calorie and nutrient loads. The closer the food is to a raw, unprepared, non-processed state, the closer the calories are likely to be to other published values.

I'm not sure what kind of box you are getting a baked egg from, but in general where there is a discrepency between the caloreis in fitday and the calories on the label of the food you are about to eat, always go with the label values.

The calories in any food can vary naturally. For example the calories in "beef" depend on the fat. A well marbled steak will have significantly more calories per oz than a very lean steak. Therefore entering "steak" in your foods journal may not reflect what you actually ate. The biggest variation in calories comes in processed foods, like frozen or canned foods. A generic value for "chicken soup" is hard to establish because cheaper soups typically contain more water and less chicken thus making them lower in calorie than premium chicken soups, which may taste better but are more calorie dense.

Although the foods library in Fitday can be pretty handy, creating your own custom foods is by far more accurate.

I hope that helps a little.

RunbikeSki is offline  
Old 05-02-2010, 11:11 AM
FitDay Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4

Yes that makes sense. Also I figured out that I was browsing foods instead of searching for what I wanted and the latter works much better. Thanks Pam
The__Dude is offline  
Old 05-02-2010, 03:21 PM
FitDay Member
Lizzycritter's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 687

FitDay assumes a lot more fat in cooking than I actually use. Maybe it assumes the egg was baked with butter or something.
Lizzycritter is offline  
Old 05-28-2010, 12:35 AM
FitDay Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2
Unhappy FitDay calorie count discrepencies

I have also found it frustrating that the calorie count is way off...for example I went to add "corn white" to my food for the day. (This was frozen organic so I have the food lable.) However to do it quickly I tried the food search and found that fitday wanted to alot over 600 calories for 1 cup. When in fact the food lable says that is worth only 90 calories. OK, I understand a little wiggle room, but a 510 calorie difference???? (additionally, the calorie count that fitday has for "corn sweet white raw" is about 132 per cup)

I find using the food lables and creating custom foods, for the things I eat most, is the best way to get an accurate count. I don't know where fitday comes up with some of these amounts. I have even resorted to other sites to get better idea of raw foods so that I know what I'm actually consuming.

Does anyone have other sites that they use to find calorie counts?
SaraTaylor2006 is offline  
Old 06-01-2010, 03:03 AM
FitDay Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Exclamation McDifference

I also found some differences when looking at the food from McDonalds. For Some reason FitDay information was lowe, in calories than what is stated on the McDonlad Website and they seem to have information about nutrients that aren't reported on the Mcdonalds website either.

Seems a bit odd to me. Perhaps they are sending thing s to the lab to get tested? If so, awesome...

otherwise, I wonder how I can help make the official numbers match between FitDay and mcdonalds website.

gsteinmon is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:14 AM
FitDay Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3

I use fitday more for the charts than anything.
I use a calorie check book ( which also lists amount of carbs protein fat and some vitamins) to find out the calories in the foods i eat. I write everything down on paper during the day, and when i get home i put it in fitday. having the book with me, i can look something up and decide if i want to eat it. After 2-3 weeks, you learn to memorize the calorie and fat content of things you eat often, which is more helpful than anything in your decision making. you should know how big 3 or 4 ounces of meat is, and how big a cup of vegetables is for portion control too.

i've noticed corn is wrong ( 1 cup can be anywhere from 90-130 calories depending on it process)
Chicken breast (boneless skinless) is also wrong ( fitday says 2 oz is 222 calories, when three ounces is usually around 90-110 depending on fat content)

sometimes i find things that are similar, and change the amount eaten so that it represents the correct calorie content. usually it affects my carb/fat balance a bit though.
cazattack is offline  
Old 08-05-2010, 08:04 AM
FitDay Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2

Iam totally frustrated with the calorie counts of the FitDay program. All the vegetables are off and I have searched 4 other web sites. How can an ounce of cauliflower have half of it's calories from fat?? Same with squash, cabbage, broccolli, etc.

Some one help This is way way off.
twgentry is offline  
Old 08-05-2010, 08:41 AM
Super Moderator
cjohnson728's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,083

I noticed the same thing with the veggies. Instead of using the Search box, go to the Browse section and find your vegetable. For most, it gives you many options, including "cooked [from fresh, frozen, etc.] with fat not added in cooking" (or added in cooking, if you do that). It's more of a pain but more accurate.
cjohnson728 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.