Difference between two chicken options
04-03-2012, 08:57 PM
#1
FitDay Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Difference between two chicken options
hi,
2)
Why does the (Chicken, breast, fried, no coating - 124Cals) option have less calaries than the (Checken, breast, fried, no coating, skin not eaten) option?
Does the first option assume that the chicken brest was cooked without the skin, but the second was cooked with the skin, only the skin was not eaten in the end?
1)
Also, what do they mean by Coated? I don't suppose there is a description of these terms somewhere? I mean ones like coated, the rest I know
3) Can't seem to find "chicken, breast, fried, no coating, prepared skinless"
<< total nub, but Thanks
)
2)
Why does the (Chicken, breast, fried, no coating - 124Cals) option have less calaries than the (Checken, breast, fried, no coating, skin not eaten) option?
Does the first option assume that the chicken brest was cooked without the skin, but the second was cooked with the skin, only the skin was not eaten in the end?
1)
Also, what do they mean by Coated? I don't suppose there is a description of these terms somewhere? I mean ones like coated, the rest I know
3) Can't seem to find "chicken, breast, fried, no coating, prepared skinless"
<< total nub, but Thanks
)
Last edited by aymanzone; 04-03-2012 at 09:16 PM.
04-04-2012, 01:50 AM
#2
FitDay Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 365
http://www.fitday.com/fitness/FoodVi...y=s-sr19-f5063
This is what I use for what you are describing. Coating could mean a lot of things, I see it as heavy flour, salt and seasonings but I don't know for sure what their definition is.
This is what I use for what you are describing. Coating could mean a lot of things, I see it as heavy flour, salt and seasonings but I don't know for sure what their definition is.
