Go Back   FitDay Discussion Boards > FITDAY FORUMS > Off-Topic
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-21-2012, 04:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
cjohnson728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,083
Default The Election!

Noooo, I'm not about to invite an Obama-Romney debate, but I am fascinated with this aspect of voting day: Proposed Law Calls for GMO Labeling | National News | United States | Epoch Times

In California, voters will have the opportunity to vote for whether GMO foods must be labeled as such. It's thought to have huge implications, because often, as California goes, so goes the rest of the nation eventually.

I read about this a couple months ago and I've been on a mission ever since to find as much information as I can so I can make the best decisions for myself and my family. Figuring out how to do this, without breaking the food budget, has been challenging. And as is often the case, the internet provides way too much information for my own good!

Does anyone have some thoughts on this? I think GMOs were discussed a while back in a thread, but thought I'd post since we have so many new folks now.
__________________
Cassie

And now that you don't have to be perfect, you can be good.
-John Steinbeck
cjohnson728 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 06:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
FitDay Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 106
Default I'd vote for it!

This issue came up several times in my nutrition and sustainability classes in school. I'm sure that there would probably be a higher food cost in the beginning, but it would probably level out in about a year, and the potential reduction in medical bills would greatly outweigh the start up costs.
__________________
~Angela~
39 YO Female, 5'7"
Join Date 7/6/12
Weight on 6/20/12 = 245.2 / BMI @ 38.4
Current Weight = 187.4 / BMI @ 29.35
Pounds Lost = 57.8 / BMI - 9.05

12/25/13 Goal = 175 / BMI @ 27.41
Pounds to go = 12.4

Inches lost= 26.5

Goal Weight = 150 / BMI @ 23.49
Pounds to go = 37.4


What I've learned along the way:

Just because no one sees it, doesn't mean it doesn't count

If at first you don't succeed... try, try again
4.a.healthier.me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 07:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
FitDay Member
 
Kumochi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 955
Default

It's an interesting issue. Will all the hybred grains be considered genetically modified? There are many that have been modified over the past 60 years to resist disease, produce more, mature sooner or be more drought or frost resistant. They were modified by selected plant breeding - not gene munipulation at the cellular level, but modified all the same.

I guess labeling would allow people to make an informed choice. Mary
__________________
Mary

Restarting Jan 11th, 2014
Starting weight: 201.6
Current weight: June 9, 2014 181.4
June 30th goal = 170

Ultimate goal Undecided ? 150 to be assessed once maintained for a while
Height 5' 3"
Age 67
Kumochi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 07:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
FitDay Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,050
Default

Against: GMOs
For: labelling
__________________
Hope
Current: 136.8
Mini Goal: 133 by October 31
canary52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 04:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
FitDay Premium Member
 
RunbikeSki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,042
Default

Being in California my opinion is that it's a wonderful idea, but the ballot initiative is really flawed (as is often the case with voter written legislation). The way it is written it will have a ton of unintended consequences in part because of the exemptions and frankly many food processors don't really know whether their supplies are GMO or not. (Perhaps that's part of the purpose).

As far as GMOs goes, I would rather not eat foods that have DNA imported from a completely different organism, but genetic manipulation is what breeding programs are all about, so we have, in essence, been eating GMOs since the first farmers started saving seeds from plants that exhibited some prefered characteristic.

I really hate the Monsanto GMOs that have created herbicide resistant plants so farmers can spray the heck out of fields, but GMOs that have enhances nutrient qualities, like golden rice, seem ultimately beneficial for populations that cannot get enough vitamin A (I think it is A... but don't quote me) through their regular diet.

I think the GMO question is really complicated, and to universally ban them as some countries have done, is probably short sighted. But I do agree that consumers ought to have enough information to make informed choices, just as we do when we are comparing a can of beans that has added sugar or salt vs. one w/o the sugar & salt. I'm just do not think that the proposed ballot measure is the right mechanism.
__________________
Pam
5'4" 55yr

2.5 years, 45 pounds later... 128ish pounds
RunbikeSki is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2