Go Back   FitDay Discussion Boards > FOOD > Nutrition & labeling
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-05-2010, 04:10 AM   #1 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
cjohnson728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,083
Default Eek!

I just read that the FDA gives a 20% leeway in accuracy with nutritional information on packaging. Is this true? Am I the only one who didn't know this? That seems like a LOT! Hopefully the "overages" average out with the "underages".
cjohnson728 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 05:41 AM   #2 (permalink)
FitDay Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 171
Default

One way to beat that, is to try and avoid packaged food and eat more whole foods.
__________________
____________________________________
Jan 1, 2010 175
Feb 5, 2010 164.6 Lost: 10.6 lbs
____________________________________
Goal:
Mar 31, 2010 150
kathietaylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 12:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
FitDay Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 109
Default The packaging is off on a lot of labels

The RDI allowances are generalizations anyway. The range of what particular bodies need is pretty wide, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.

The FDA doesn't develop their own data anyway. They accept whatever the manufacturer submits in most cases. The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has a some de-bunking data available on the labels they've tested themselves.

You may want to take a look.
KimmyRocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2